Problem with parameter to a SuperBASIC machine code extension

[swensont]

> BTW: Has anyone tried to run my reflection toolkit with compiled code (IMHO NO chance with Turbo and most probably also not even with QLiberator).

I've not tried your toolkit, mostly because I don't care about line number with SuperBasic. I write all SuperBasic without line numbers and let my pre-processor do all of the dirty work. The code looks so much better with no line numbers. I can't imagine programming with C, Pascal, Perl, or awk with line numbers, so why do it with SuperBasic. (just my 2 cents).

Tim

[NormanDunbar]

What Tim said! I haven't used line numbers in Super basic for ages!

Cheers,
Norm.

[ql_freak]

Good news:

Today I finished the "main" program of the missing function, and it seems to work.

Bad News:

I'm programming top (mostly very easy) down (mostly very complicated) and the 2 (assembler) subroutines, which do the real work, must still be written (they are currently only dummies, but at least they are called from the main program[!]).