Q_Liberator malaise

Anything QL Software or Programming Related.
User avatar
RalfR
QL Wafer Drive
Posts: 1177
Joined: Fri Jun 15, 2018 8:58 pm

Re: Q_Liberator malaise

Post by RalfR »

BSJR wrote: Thu May 01, 2025 10:56 amThe old keywords are switched off by default in FI2 but if a program expects the old ones they can be switched on again.
I find it strange why the existing keywords always have to be changed just because someone had another idea for SMSQ/E.


7000 4E75
User avatar
tofro
Font of All Knowledge
Posts: 3070
Joined: Sun Feb 13, 2011 10:53 pm
Location: SW Germany

Re: Q_Liberator malaise

Post by tofro »

RalfR wrote: Thu May 01, 2025 11:15 am
BSJR wrote: Thu May 01, 2025 10:56 amThe old keywords are switched off by default in FI2 but if a program expects the old ones they can be switched on again.
I find it strange why the existing keywords always have to be changed just because someone had another idea for SMSQ/E.
"always" <> once in forty years. And that one time, that was handled like the fall of the Roman Empire by some people back then...


ʎɐqǝ ɯoɹɟ ǝq oʇ ƃuᴉoƃ ʇou sᴉ pɹɐoqʎǝʞ ʇxǝu ʎɯ 'ɹɐǝp ɥO
User avatar
dilwyn
Mr QL
Posts: 3056
Joined: Wed Dec 01, 2010 10:39 pm

Re: Q_Liberator malaise

Post by dilwyn »

RalfR wrote: Thu May 01, 2025 11:15 am
BSJR wrote: Thu May 01, 2025 10:56 amThe old keywords are switched off by default in FI2 but if a program expects the old ones they can be switched on again.
I find it strange why the existing keywords always have to be changed just because someone had another idea for SMSQ/E.
I suppose that Sbasic has so many keywords, it's bound to happen sooner or later. There are lists of keyword names used out there, but I don't remember if they existed at the time. And when it comes to operating system (or rather, Basic interpreter) versus an application for who gets to use a name, the operating system will usually win, I guess. Although as Wolfgang has been involved with both, it's a bit of an unusual situation with this one!


Post Reply