QLay2Web: browser version of QL-emulator QLAY2

Discussion and advice about emulating the QL on other machines.
Post Reply
j_p
ROM Dongle
Posts: 2
Joined: Thu Feb 06, 2025 8:45 pm

QLay2Web: browser version of QL-emulator QLAY2

Post by j_p »

I have published an experimental online browser version of the QL-emulator QLAY2
named "QLay2Web" at "https://www.poesl.org/emulatoren/ql/QLay2WebSf.php".
Anyone can use this emulator for free non-commercially
and should be aware of the limitations due to QLAY2-core
and port to WASM. Necessary is a browser of 2024 or later (tested with
FireFox, Edge, Chrome).
A short description and sample configurations of the emulator can be found
at "https://www.poesl.org/emulatoren/ql/QLa ... lisch.html".
Due to private development and time limitations I have no resources for
further development or support at the moment. So it may be used at it is...


User avatar
XorA
Site Admin
Posts: 1580
Joined: Thu Jun 02, 2011 11:31 am
Location: Shotts, North Lanarkshire, Scotland, UK

Re: QLay2Web: browser version of QL-emulator QLAY2

Post by XorA »

j_p wrote: Sun Feb 09, 2025 9:39 am Anyone can use this emulator for free non-commercially
If its actually based on qlay2 the GPL license does not allow you to add this extra term to the license!

It is very cool, the sqlay3 and sqlux codebases both support WASM, sqlux is even hosted by the forum above!


j_p
ROM Dongle
Posts: 2
Joined: Thu Feb 06, 2025 8:45 pm

Re: QLay2Web: browser version of QL-emulator QLAY2

Post by j_p »

Sorry, but it was not my intention to cause a discussion about licences.
I have stopped publication in order not to inconvenience somebody.
Sorry again for any inconveniencies.


User avatar
XorA
Site Admin
Posts: 1580
Joined: Thu Jun 02, 2011 11:31 am
Location: Shotts, North Lanarkshire, Scotland, UK

Re: QLay2Web: browser version of QL-emulator QLAY2

Post by XorA »

j_p wrote: Sun Feb 09, 2025 5:36 pm Sorry, but it was not my intention to cause a discussion about licences.
I have stopped publication in order not to inconvenience somebody.
Sorry again for any inconveniencies.
I dont think anyone is inconvenienced, Im just a FOSS developer by trade so pick up on license mistakes easily :-D

Its a pity you decided to unpublish as it was pretty cool!


Post Reply