Not time to actually play with it yet as I have some APIs to write (boo!) and am going out for drinks tonight (yay!)
This weekend is going to be replacing my QL keyboard membrane and setting up the Next. Could be worse

Fair point. You are right that this is a luxury purchase. I just think for the quality of the product, it's good value. I fully accept that it's not universally affordable. As you say, it would be great if they could get the price down, but as Stephen points out, the small run and the fact that it has to come from China probably means that this won't happen in the near future. The N-GO is a much more affordable option, as you get a 100% KS1 compatible board, just without that lovely exterior shell/keyboard.Derek_Stewart wrote: Fri Dec 15, 2023 12:07 pm The main problem I have is that I am very poor and can not afford to buy all these fancy ready made computers, so I have to build them myself.
I believe there is, but it's not in a releasable state at the moment, and the author is I think more interested in writing arcade machine cores so it may never be available. But TBH, I didn't really want a Next for the QL side of things, I have a QL and Q68 for that, but for its enhanced Spectrum and CP/M abilities. Also I'll probably get the BBC and Amstrad cores running too if they update them for the new FPGA. A QL core would be a bonus of course, one more machine able to run QDOS is always a good thingSpectrum Next, more expensive than the cost of a Q68, which is still the same price and it can not run a QL operating system, there maybe a QL core for the Next, but does it run SMSQ/E?
The Q68 was and is amazing value for money. Thanks again for building them - it's very much appreciated.By the way, the price of the Q68 has not changed since I posted production details over 4 years.