So microcassettes are 3.81 mm wide (same as standard compact cassettes) and microdrives are around 1/16 of an inch which is about 1.6 mm wide. So watching Techmoan the other day I saw this:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t5FqjQlFBDM
Picocassettes are thinner than microcassettes. I haven't found a spec for them yet online but at 1:45 in the video you can see that it's about half the size of a microcassette (at 3.81 mm). So that comes to 1.9 mm for the picocassette. The "half size" is just eyeballing it so it may be close to or exactly 1.6 mm. Quality of tape I don't know and the picocassetts are also hard to come by, though one seller on eBay has more than 10 at $8.95/each currently (which includes shipping). One tape holds 30 minutes per side and the tape speed is 9 mm/sec which comes out to be 16,200 mm of tape length which is 53 feet of tape. I took a microdrive apart recently because the tape broke and I lost one end of it but don't recall how many feet it is though it wasn't close to that.
At 7.25 he talks about the Sony NT which is a higher quality digital tape but it is thicker at 2.5 mm (there is a spec for it). Even though it looks the same size you can see that its a tiny bit thicker in the case (or the picocassette maybe had more blank area in its width).
So, an analog cassette, would that work? I know the microdrives used a quality of tape similar to video recording tapes but it would be an inexpensive thing to try and spool one of these at the right length onto a microdrive and see what you got. I think Mattel used to have a video recorder that recorded on compact cassette which didn't work well but could still capture grainy black and wide video and sound so maybe the quality of the tape could work. Still, at $8.95 it might be worth a try as I do have an open cassette with the tape pulled out (and spooled on a paper roll presently).