Just to be sure - is this the same Q68 that required the down-grading of the SD-Card driver access speed in order to boot from the WIN image?
If so, I'm wondering if Minerva/Min4Q68 is getting itself in a tizz by not being able to correctly read the Boot image and, unlike SMSQe, which simply fails to mount the image and proceeds anyway, Minerva instead hangs...
The SD-card code in the bootloader itself runs at a slower speed at power-on, which is why the OS image (Min4Q68 or SMSQe) load OK - the QDOS/SMSQe SD-card driver loaded with the OS then kicks-in to read the Boot image, which is where you can expect problems if the card or the hardware for some reason can't support the higher (40MHz?) access-speed.
On both my Q68s, it has not been necessary to down-grade the SD-card access speed - EXCEPT - after extending one of SD-slots to to another SD-Card bracket via a 15cm cable (Q68 in a QL Case). Whilst that scenario is to be expected (due to the extra cable length), we wouldn't normally expect it when using the built-in SD-Card bracket in the Q68.
I'm not sure whether it is possible to configure Min4Q68 to reduce the default SD-Card access speed in the way it is for SMSQe, but it may be worth exploring this line of enquiry further.
It still doesn't explain why reducing the access-speed should be necessary at all on your ill-fated Q68 unit

Fortunately, once resolved (and it will be, I'm sure!), you have yourself a brilliant bit of kit in the Q68 - in a future post I will be sharing some of the funky things I've managed to get the Q68 to do
