tofro wrote: Thu May 08, 2025 12:25 pm
I think that's more a TV than a converter thing: Some TVs will display everything, some are off to the left. The cheaper the TV is, apparently the better it works. The cheap Chinese TVs I have work absolutely fine, a Sony and Samsung TV both shift the picture to the left.
It is a little more complicate than the image produced or generated by those devices.
Sometimes it is not about better or worse, but standards, compatibilities (before), policies... too long to describe.
Just keep in mind that there are a lot of complexity and what works for me, could not work for you.
That is the main reason why I prefer to rely on of policies and procedures than very specific acknowledge.
A little example is when you put by Vid.comp your QL in mode 2 vs mode 8. Same computer, same cable, same display... why the hell is hiding first columns?
Just to expose the problematic:
Computers versions could have different video modules or treatments for signals.
Computers may have different video modes that modify video signals affecting how the image is displayed on a TV/Monitor.
Same computers versions could have different clocks for signals (PAL vs NTSC)
Cables could have different ways to built up.
Cables could have different materials.
Cables could have different lengths
Videos converters brand and looking could be faulty in a high percent
Video converters brand and looking could have gotten different components (capacitors the most common)
Video converters brand and looking could work in 2 different mode: Active or passive.
Video Converters bran... .... may have different clocks signals (PAL...)
V... could be sold even faulty in an important number
V... connectors may fail due bad soldering or low quality flux resting on it
V... and the cable may not connect well (micro interruptions or even shorts)
... and yet we didn't start to list all the options for a TV...
So IMO it is so complex that I don't dare to be sure about some specific context. Thus I prefer to start from the point zero and start to check basic things than more specific, trying to consider every imaginable option but prioritizing the most common group of them. And about devices... as I said, when it is possible (not your case by your comment) to give the link of the seller that was fine for me, and the same model that I have tested. Always (you warned it) warning about the complexity (typical "it works for me" is an enough good warning).
Nothing more frustrating than to buy something that was supposedly to works great and fail with me. When I was aware of it may happen, no problem.
Do you understand my point?
It is not an attack to you when you are nice helping,
It is my policy when I try to help.
For me, it makes sense.