Page 3 of 3

Re: SlipKnot-sytle browser for QL

Posted: Sun Mar 09, 2025 12:35 pm
by tofro
swensont wrote: Sun Mar 09, 2025 3:29 am > No offense intended, but: I really don't get it why people repeatedly come back to the idea of having a working browser on the QL.

It is exactly this kind of thinking that keeps guys like us from dating supermodels.
Nah,

there's a difference between high initial investment and high continuous maintenance cost.
A QL browser is the former, a supermodel the latter. :)

Re: SlipKnot-sytle browser for QL

Posted: Sun Mar 09, 2025 5:35 pm
by bwinkel67
A super model is probably both :-)