QLCommander v 2.2.7- For Testers!

[tofro]

Andrew, did you ever test MDxxx with your 14TB disks?

I did some tests a few weeks ago - up to 4 TB is ok, beyond 4TB the info is not correct, but at least is not crashing. I will test again today.

Well, there seems to be a bit of capacity in reserve, then

[pjw]

Andrew, did you ever test MDxxx with your 14TB disks?

I did some tests a few weeks ago - up to 4 TB is ok, beyond 4TB the info is not correct, but at least is not crashing. I will test again today.
But i found a possible bug in MDFree - i will document it, with steps.

It would be interesting for me to know what STAT (and ideally QPAC2 too..) does with disks > 4TB on QPC2 and SMSQmulator. Obviously, MDxxx is not able to do better than the platform it is on as It relies in large part on system calls. Q-emulator, I believe, simply limits the size of host OS devices it is prepared to support. That seems to me to be the sensible approach. I mean, why would anyone in the QL universe want to know about petabyte hard disks and beyond..?

[pjw]

Andrew, did you ever test MDxxx with your 14TB disks?

I did some tests a few weeks ago - up to 4 TB is ok, beyond 4TB the info is not correct, but at least is not crashing. I will test again today.
But i found a possible bug in MDFree - i will document it, with steps.

Id be very glad to get your feedback! (Sorry for all the trouble youre having with it!)

[pjw]

Andrew, did you ever test MDxxx with your 14TB disks?

I did some tests a few weeks ago - up to 4 TB is ok, beyond 4TB the info is not correct, but at least is not crashing. I will test again today.

Well, there seems to be a bit of capacity in reserve, then

Yes, all my programming projects are starting to pile up..

[dilwyn]

Andrew, did you ever test MDxxx with your 14TB disks?

I did some tests a few weeks ago - up to 4 TB is ok, beyond 4TB the info is not correct, but at least is not crashing. I will test again today.

Well, there seems to be a bit of capacity in reserve, then

4TB... and that's just for the QL software he writes

[javier2112]

1) If I set up an unmounted partition as initial path for a panel, QLC displays the following message error:
"Task QLC227M4 halted, after line 15345. Reason: not found."

Then QLC closes. In v21, it beeps but doesn't close.

At line 15345 I call MDFREE that calculates the free space in drive. MDFREE is part of Per's toolkit MDINFO.
In v2.1 I did not displayed the free space on drive, so I didn't used MDINFO ...

I cannot replicate this bug on my systems (QPC, Q68, QL+SGC+QL-SD)
So I need more details about your system: memory, storage (Qubide, QL-SD or QIMSI). When you say "unmounted partition" my guess is that you are using a QUBIDE.
I have no idea how to test if a partition is mounted or not. Maybe someone knows and can help!!

My QL is a stock with 896KB RAM, a Trump Card and a José Leandro's QubIDE with a 128Mb drive, partitioned in 3 units (win1, win2, win3) of the same size. In QubIDE systems, only win1 is mounted by default at boot.

I've been trying hard last QLC beta and I've discovered another fail that ocurrs when trying to view o extract the contents of a zip file whose file name contains some spaces. For example, you'll get a "Not found error" with a file called "flp1_PE guide". I suppose QLC makes a call similar to:
EX unzip;"-d whateverpath flp1_PE guide"

This obviously fails, but can be easily corrected with inner single quotes (or the other way):
EX unzip;"-d whateverpath 'flp1_PE guide'"

Another fail arises also when trying to view o extract the contents of a zip file, when you exited from QLC and re-entering it twice o more times. QLC doesn't display any error but no contents of the zip file. Maybe to load QLC code as an extension causes the problem, because its memory is not freed and the extension is reloaded every time QLC is executed?

[Andrew]

I did some tests a few weeks ago - up to 4 TB is ok, beyond 4TB the info is not correct, but at least is not crashing. I will test again today.

Well, there seems to be a bit of capacity in reserve, then

4TB... and that's just for the QL software he writes

[Andrew]

PS: Executing QLC227_exe in SMSQmulator I get the error "MORE is not loaded"

I have checked - More is included in qlcmin_code and qlcsms_code.
Have you loaded qlcsms_code?

[Andrew]

1) If I set up an unmounted partition as initial path for a panel, QLC displays the following message error:
"Task QLC227M4 halted, after line 15345. Reason: not found."

Fixed - if initial directory is not found then it defaults to win1_
(There already was a workaround for this: just use qlcconfig_bas and set the program to start with win1_ in both panels)

2) Sometimes, when I try to list the contents or unzip a zip file, I get an error like before close itself:
"Task QLC227M4 halted, after line 18190 adjust DATASPACE please."

Fixed - increased dataspace

I've been trying hard last QLC beta and I've discovered another fail that ocurrs when trying to view o extract the contents of a zip file whose file name contains some spaces. For example, you'll get a "Not found error" with a file called "flp1_PE guide".

Fixed
Note - is bad practice to use filenames that contain space. Also a filename must have no more than 1 underscore that separates the name and extension.

Another fail arises also when trying to view o extract the contents of a zip file, when you exited from QLC and re-entering it twice o more times. QLC doesn't display any error but no contents of the zip file. Maybe to load QLC code as an extension causes the problem, because its memory is not freed and the extension is reloaded every time QLC is executed?

Could not replicate. I started and stopped QLCommander 15 times, and each time I was able to view and extract the zip file.
QLCommander only executes the external zip/unzip/viewzip programs (those included in the kit) - QLC_code has no code for zip.

Please download and test the new version

[pjw]

PS: Executing QLC227_exe in SMSQmulator I get the error "MORE is not loaded"

I have checked - More is included in qlcmin_code and qlcsms_code.
Have you loaded qlcsms_code?

Oops! I must have missed the memo. I wasnt aware the toolkit code had to be LRESPRed prior. Will it be baked in, as one does, in the final version?